Help with trig in my hack

[lanman92]

I'm making a list of locations that will need to be 6 yards apart each. I have a start and end point. I'm using atan to get the angle for the right triangle. I was hoping someone could point me in the right direction to finish this up.

[bierstud]

Um, so you're trying to get the angle between your current facing direction and the next location in a list? More details please.

[lanman92]

No, I have no problem finding angle etc. I am having issues making the list of locations itself. I have a start and end location, but I need to find points in between at 6 unit increments.

[ramey]

implement a A* path finding. Google, and to get waypoints 6 yards apart check the distance from each waypoint to the next

[SKU]

Originally Posted by lanman92

No, I have no problem finding angle etc. I am having issues making the list of locations itself. I have a start and end location, but I need to find points in between at 6 unit increments.

You really gotta be more specific. Is it supposed to be a staight line? There's an infinite number of ways to connect 2 points.

If it's supposed to be a straight line:

Point A(xa,ya,za) and point B(xb,yb,zb).

v = (xb-xa,yb-ya,zb-za) = (xv,yv,zv)
n = sqrt(xv^2 + yv^2 + zv^2)
w = 1 / n * v

OP[ i ] = OA + 6i * w = P[ i ] // P[ i ] is the i-th point that is 6*i yards away from point A into the direction of AB.

[lanman92]

I think that's what I was looking for. I needed a straight line. +rep.

EDIT: I'm guessing that last part, OP[ i ] = OA + 6i * w = P[ i ], will have to be a matrix?

[ggg898]

Then theres another question, Im tired but cant figure out why you need several waypoints on a straight line...

[schlumpf]

void getPointsBetween(Vec3f a, Vec3f b, Vec3f *Points[])
{
	Vec3f v = a - b;
	float n = sqrt(v.x*v.x + v.y*v.y + v.z*v.z);
	Vec3f w = (1 / n) * v; // = Vec3f( (1/n)*v.x,  (1/n)*v.y,  (1/n)*v.z );

#define STEPSIZE 2
	int numPoints = n/STEPSIZE;
	Points = new Vec3f[numPoints];
	for( int i = 0; i < numPoints; i++ )
	{
		Points[i] = a + ((STEPSIZE*i)*w); // = Vec3f( a.x + STEPSIZE*i*v.x, a.y + STEPSIZE*i*v.y, a.z + STEPSIZE*i*v.z );
	}
}

(Its 0437. Tired. Excuse errors.)

[lanman92]

Thank you very much schlumpf

EDIT: Anyone know how to make your window stay on top when you select WoW? It's an injected form through clr hosting, and topmost property doesnt work. Tips?

[vulcanaoc]

Use p/invoke to call SetWindowPos. [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Pass HWND_TOPMOST to the second argument, hWndInsertAfter. HWND_TOPMOST can be defined as -1 *I think*.

Of course, none of this may work.. I haven't tested it.

[lanman92]

I'm pretty sure that won't work, but I'll give it a shot I have to imagine that this is the API that .NET uses internally.

Nope, didn't work

[FartBlast]

I've set my WoW to windowed and maximized, and my app to stay ontop, works fine for me. but that's not what you really want I assume

[lanman92]

No, it's because my form is created behind WoW in z-order for some reason. It wants to stay that way. I've been looking for a way to draw a form onto a directx control or something... No avail yet.

By behind in z-order, I mean that my window is a child of WoW and it wants to be in front. lol.

[Cypher]

Originally Posted by schlumpf

void getPointsBetween(Vec3f a, Vec3f b, Vec3f *Points[])
{
	Vec3f v = a - b;
	float n = sqrt(v.x*v.x + v.y*v.y + v.z*v.z);
	Vec3f w = (1 / n) * v; // = Vec3f( (1/n)*v.x,  (1/n)*v.y,  (1/n)*v.z );

#define STEPSIZE 2
	int numPoints = n/STEPSIZE;
	Points = new Vec3f[numPoints];
	for( int i = 0; i < numPoints; i++ )
	{
		Points[i] = a + ((STEPSIZE*i)*w); // = Vec3f( a.x + STEPSIZE*i*v.x, a.y + STEPSIZE*i*v.y, a.z + STEPSIZE*i*v.z );
	}
}

(Its 0437. Tired. Excuse errors.)

Just wanted to point out to anyone who wants to use code based off this there are some things you need to keep in mind:
The vectors are heap allocated and hence need to be manually deleted. To avoid this problem use a shared_ptr.
The way the data is returned is also potentially more dangerous than it needs to be. You're better off either making the function take a vector by reference, or take an insertion iterator. The most obvious candidate for the latter being a back_inserter. The advantage of an insertion iterator is that you can generalize the algorithm so that it's not container-dependent.
Also, if you're dealing with large data sets you might want to catch bad_alloc exceptions in-case 'operator new' throws (or if your C++ implementation uses a nothrow new implementation then do a null check), then return a boolean indicating whether the operation succeeded or not.

[schlumpf]

Yep, that's been a very ugly one. Its more C than ++. Ugly and dangerous, but at least working. ^^