Network: WoW Gold | WoW Accounts | MPS Games | FPSowned
MMOwned - World of Warcraft Exploits, Hacks, Bots and Guides
Homepage »      Register »      Hall of Fame »      Ranks And Awards »      Advertise »      Marketplace »
 
Sign up



Do you like this excellent information? Then Donate HERE to remove ads and support the MMOwned community.


Go Back   MMOwned - World of Warcraft Exploits, Hacks, Bots and Guides > World of Warcraft > Bots and Programs > WoW Memory Editing

WoW Memory Editing WoW Memory Editing for learning purposes only.
This section is more advanced than others on MMOwned Read the section specific rules, infractions will be given out if u break them!That is including the expectations! - If you don't meet them then don't post

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-02-2009
roxaz911 is offline.
Site n00b.. (A leecher if I've been here for more than a month and can't earn 5 rep)
  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8
Reputation: 1
Points: 168, Level: 1
Points: 168, Level: 1 Points: 168, Level: 1 Points: 168, Level: 1
Level up: 43%, 232 Points needed
Level up: 43% Level up: 43% Level up: 43%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

BlackMagic & api hooking

I noticed that lots of you guys are using this BlackMagic lib, but couldnt find it anywhere.. maybe my searching skills suck.. but anyway.. what i aim to do is to hook wow api. now i have mixed mode dll in action, works just fine. reason its mixed mode just because i like making GUI in .NET. however if there was possibility to make whole project in .NET that would be even better, cause mixed mode dll feels like some additional unnecessary work (wrappers and stuff to interact between managed <-> unmanaged).

so can BlackMagic actually hook api and where do i get this bloody lib from?
Reply With Quote


Donate to remove ads, get your "DONATOR title, and get access to the MMOwned community's elite Shoutbawx.

  #2  
Old 06-02-2009
~OddBall~'s Avatar
~OddBall~ is offline.
Contributor
  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 826
Reputation: 103
Points: 4,229, Level: 6
Points: 4,229, Level: 6 Points: 4,229, Level: 6 Points: 4,229, Level: 6
Level up: 70%, 271 Points needed
Level up: 70% Level up: 70% Level up: 70%
Activity: 7.7%
Activity: 7.7% Activity: 7.7% Activity: 7.7%

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

enjoy
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-02-2009
roxaz911 is offline.
Site n00b.. (A leecher if I've been here for more than a month and can't earn 5 rep)
  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8
Reputation: 1
Points: 168, Level: 1
Points: 168, Level: 1 Points: 168, Level: 1 Points: 168, Level: 1
Level up: 43%, 232 Points needed
Level up: 43% Level up: 43% Level up: 43%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

ah ha! thanks. seems it doesnt rly support api hooking. i guess ill stay with my mixed mode dll idea. c++ gives more control over everything anyway. thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-02-2009
Cypher's Avatar
Cypher is offline.
Kynox's sister's pimp
Legendary User
  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ntdll.dll
Posts: 4,506
Nominated 63 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated TOTM/W Award(s): 1
Reputation: 1117
Points: 62,489, Level: 37
Points: 62,489, Level: 37 Points: 62,489, Level: 37 Points: 62,489, Level: 37
Level up: 3%, 3,711 Points needed
Level up: 3% Level up: 3% Level up: 3%
Activity: 23.3%
Activity: 23.3% Activity: 23.3% Activity: 23.3%

You could write your own .NET detours library. It wouldn't be difficult at all.

Though, being .NET its not exactly gonna be pretty to write.
__________________
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Results of MaiN getting trolled in regards to mixing managed and unmanaged code:
Quote:
(4:25:36 PM) MaiN: I really don't care what you think
(4:25:41 PM) Cypher: rifk
(4:25:42 PM) Cypher: trolled
(4:25:47 PM) MaiN: no seriously
(4:25:50 PM) MaiN: I never have
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-02-2009
roxaz911 is offline.
Site n00b.. (A leecher if I've been here for more than a month and can't earn 5 rep)
  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8
Reputation: 1
Points: 168, Level: 1
Points: 168, Level: 1 Points: 168, Level: 1 Points: 168, Level: 1
Level up: 43%, 232 Points needed
Level up: 43% Level up: 43% Level up: 43%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

well i can think of making one global hook (all in unmanaged dll) that like detects what custom function to call depending on return address on the stack, but there is a problem - what if i dont hook a call? what if i need to reimplement instructions i overwrote? that might get ugly in the process. i guess writing such lib quite defeats purpose - would still be a mess with limited functionallity.. i saw a lib tho, that lets to execute asm code in .NET, but that required supplying raw bytes of assemble code what is no good..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-02-2009
Cypher's Avatar
Cypher is offline.
Kynox's sister's pimp
Legendary User
  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ntdll.dll
Posts: 4,506
Nominated 63 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated TOTM/W Award(s): 1
Reputation: 1117
Points: 62,489, Level: 37
Points: 62,489, Level: 37 Points: 62,489, Level: 37 Points: 62,489, Level: 37
Level up: 3%, 3,711 Points needed
Level up: 3% Level up: 3% Level up: 3%
Activity: 23.3%
Activity: 23.3% Activity: 23.3% Activity: 23.3%

Quote:
Originally Posted by roxaz911 View Post
well i can think of making one global hook (all in unmanaged dll) that like detects what custom function to call depending on return address on the stack, but there is a problem - what if i dont hook a call? what if i need to reimplement instructions i overwrote? that might get ugly in the process. i guess writing such lib quite defeats purpose - would still be a mess with limited functionallity.. i saw a lib tho, that lets to execute asm code in .NET, but that required supplying raw bytes of assemble code what is no good..

What in the world are you rambling about?

Would you mind rephrasing that in a coherent and well thought-out manner so I don't have to spend 10 minutes trying to decipher what you're saying?
__________________
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Results of MaiN getting trolled in regards to mixing managed and unmanaged code:
Quote:
(4:25:36 PM) MaiN: I really don't care what you think
(4:25:41 PM) Cypher: rifk
(4:25:42 PM) Cypher: trolled
(4:25:47 PM) MaiN: no seriously
(4:25:50 PM) MaiN: I never have
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-02-2009
roxaz911 is offline.
Site n00b.. (A leecher if I've been here for more than a month and can't earn 5 rep)
  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8
Reputation: 1
Points: 168, Level: 1
Points: 168, Level: 1 Points: 168, Level: 1 Points: 168, Level: 1
Level up: 43%, 232 Points needed
Level up: 43% Level up: 43% Level up: 43%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

haha ok, ill try =D well we can not hook a managed function to native code (using jmp/call). so in order to hook a managed function to unmanaged code we need unmanaged hook that calls managed function. making wrapper function for each hook isnt that sexy if you have many hooks (would definitely work tho). i was thinking about sort of hook manager where manager hooks its own function same for all hooks. then it stores expected return address and managed function callback in some kind of the list. then when execution hits unmanaged manager hook it checks return address on the stack, then picks managed callback from the list and calls it passing certain params. when i thought of this tho... its possible to make manager to hook anything we want, it was just me not thinking far enough... eh nvm ^_^
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-03-2009
Apoc's Avatar
Apoc is offline.
MMOwned WebDev
Legendary User
  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,164
Nominated 7 Times in 3 Posts
Reputation: 1047
Points: 26,598, Level: 23
Points: 26,598, Level: 23 Points: 26,598, Level: 23 Points: 26,598, Level: 23
Level up: 65%, 602 Points needed
Level up: 65% Level up: 65% Level up: 65%
Activity: 25.7%
Activity: 25.7% Activity: 25.7% Activity: 25.7%

Quote:
Originally Posted by roxaz911 View Post
haha ok, ill try =D well we can not hook a managed function to native code (using jmp/call). so in order to hook a managed function to unmanaged code we need unmanaged hook that calls managed function. making wrapper function for each hook isnt that sexy if you have many hooks (would definitely work tho). i was thinking about sort of hook manager where manager hooks its own function same for all hooks. then it stores expected return address and managed function callback in some kind of the list. then when execution hits unmanaged manager hook it checks return address on the stack, then picks managed callback from the list and calls it passing certain params. when i thought of this tho... its possible to make manager to hook anything we want, it was just me not thinking far enough... eh nvm ^_^
Big post, with a whopping two sentences.

Also, if I'm reading correctly, you have your managed, and unmanaged definitions mixed up. Anything .NET is managed code. WoW (or native code) is unmanaged.

Also, hooking unmanaged code is not as hard as you think. It does require a sort of runaround, but nothing hard at all. Do some research about how to call managed code from unmanaged code.
__________________
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-04-2009
roxaz911 is offline.
Site n00b.. (A leecher if I've been here for more than a month and can't earn 5 rep)
  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8
Reputation: 1
Points: 168, Level: 1
Points: 168, Level: 1 Points: 168, Level: 1 Points: 168, Level: 1
Level up: 43%, 232 Points needed
Level up: 43% Level up: 43% Level up: 43%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

i have nothing mixed up as i am running mixed mode dll which contains both - managed and unmanaged code ;] anyway that is trivial to me right now as i decided to use native wow UI for what i do ;]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505