Network: WoW Gold | WoW Accounts | MPS Games | FPSowned
MMOwned - World of Warcraft Exploits, Hacks, Bots and Guides
Homepage »      Register »      Hall of Fame »      Ranks And Awards »      Advertise »      Marketplace »
 
Sign up



Do you like this excellent information? Then Donate HERE to remove ads and support the MMOwned community.


Go Back   MMOwned - World of Warcraft Exploits, Hacks, Bots and Guides > World of Warcraft > Bots and Programs > WoW Memory Editing

WoW Memory Editing WoW Memory Editing for learning purposes only.
This section is more advanced than others on MMOwned Read the section specific rules, infractions will be given out if u break them!That is including the expectations! - If you don't meet them then don't post

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-14-2008
lanman92 is offline.
Site Donator
  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 766
Reputation: 20
Points: 3,871, Level: 6
Points: 3,871, Level: 6 Points: 3,871, Level: 6 Points: 3,871, Level: 6
Level up: 31%, 629 Points needed
Level up: 31% Level up: 31% Level up: 31%
Activity: 6.3%
Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3%

packet monitoring

I've been looking at WoW's packets that it sends when I move. I've been comparing the data to the opcodes in the MangOS source code. I haven't seen any of the opcodes pointed to by the parameter. Any help here?
Reply With Quote


Donate to remove ads, get your "DONATOR title, and get access to the MMOwned community's elite Shoutbawx.

  #2  
Old 12-14-2008
Shynd's Avatar
Shynd is offline.
Contributor
  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 387
Reputation: 87
Points: 906, Level: 2
Points: 906, Level: 2 Points: 906, Level: 2 Points: 906, Level: 2
Level up: 2%, 494 Points needed
Level up: 2% Level up: 2% Level up: 2%
Activity: 0.9%
Activity: 0.9% Activity: 0.9% Activity: 0.9%

What method are you using to monitor packets?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-14-2008
lanman92 is offline.
Site Donator
  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 766
Reputation: 20
Points: 3,871, Level: 6
Points: 3,871, Level: 6 Points: 3,871, Level: 6 Points: 3,871, Level: 6
Level up: 31%, 629 Points needed
Level up: 31% Level up: 31% Level up: 31%
Activity: 6.3%
Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3%

Not really much right now, I was just putting a bp in my detoured SendPacket function.

EDIT: Ok, in the SendPacket() function, what is the data stored as? I know that kynox uses a certain class for his packet, CDataStore or something like that... I'm gonna start logging the packets and see if I can see anything different.

Last edited by lanman92; 12-14-2008 at 05:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-14-2008
Cypher's Avatar
Cypher is offline.
Kynox's sister's pimp
Legendary User
  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ntdll.dll
Posts: 4,182
Nominated 63 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated TOTM/W Award(s): 1
Reputation: 1085
Points: 55,512, Level: 35
Points: 55,512, Level: 35 Points: 55,512, Level: 35 Points: 55,512, Level: 35
Level up: 14%, 3,188 Points needed
Level up: 14% Level up: 14% Level up: 14%
Activity: 43.9%
Activity: 43.9% Activity: 43.9% Activity: 43.9%

Headers are encrypted afaik, you sure you're not looking at the encrypted header for the opcode?

If you hook the SendPacket and ProcessPacket functions you can avoid the encryption and dump out all the information you want (or modify it at will).
__________________
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] Back online!

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can **** off."
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

"I can write very coherent things when I try that sound very good" -- Styles
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-14-2008
lanman92 is offline.
Site Donator
  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 766
Reputation: 20
Points: 3,871, Level: 6
Points: 3,871, Level: 6 Points: 3,871, Level: 6 Points: 3,871, Level: 6
Level up: 31%, 629 Points needed
Level up: 31% Level up: 31% Level up: 31%
Activity: 6.3%
Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3%

The address I'm detouring is 0x005843A0. I'm not sure if this is encrypted or not. In the case that it's not, where is the opcode located? I'd imagine it being right at the top...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-15-2008
Nesox's Avatar
Nesox is offline.
MaiN's Biatch
Legendary User
  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: VirtualAllocEx
Posts: 1,115
Nominated 26 Times in 3 Posts
Nominated TOTM/W Award(s): 1
Reputation: 727
Points: 36,171, Level: 28
Points: 36,171, Level: 28 Points: 36,171, Level: 28 Points: 36,171, Level: 28
Level up: 95%, 129 Points needed
Level up: 95% Level up: 95% Level up: 95%
Activity: 14.1%
Activity: 14.1% Activity: 14.1% Activity: 14.1%

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
not sure where it's located but it shoud be in the start segments i guess
__________________
omg ive started a blog nao! what's wrong with MEH!? -> [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-15-2008
lanman92 is offline.
Site Donator
  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 766
Reputation: 20
Points: 3,871, Level: 6
Points: 3,871, Level: 6 Points: 3,871, Level: 6 Points: 3,871, Level: 6
Level up: 31%, 629 Points needed
Level up: 31% Level up: 31% Level up: 31%
Activity: 6.3%
Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3%

I have the whole thing downloaded on my PC :P I'm about to give this another go with logging and hoping I find it eventually. For all I know right now, I could be looking at pretty little ENCRYPTED packets...

EDIT: What logging lib do you guys use for VC++? I've googled but all I came up with is log4cxx, which appears to be for gcc.

Last edited by lanman92; 12-15-2008 at 11:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-15-2008
Cypher's Avatar
Cypher is offline.
Kynox's sister's pimp
Legendary User
  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ntdll.dll
Posts: 4,182
Nominated 63 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated TOTM/W Award(s): 1
Reputation: 1085
Points: 55,512, Level: 35
Points: 55,512, Level: 35 Points: 55,512, Level: 35 Points: 55,512, Level: 35
Level up: 14%, 3,188 Points needed
Level up: 14% Level up: 14% Level up: 14%
Activity: 43.9%
Activity: 43.9% Activity: 43.9% Activity: 43.9%

Mangos/Ascent/Wcell/etc all detail the structures of packets (obviously they have to). I suggest checking them out.

Logging lib? I just log info to a text file using the STL... I don't know why you need to download a 3rd party library just to log crap. Fstream ftw.
__________________
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] Back online!

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can **** off."
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

"I can write very coherent things when I try that sound very good" -- Styles
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-15-2008
BoogieManTM's Avatar
BoogieManTM is offline.
Master Sergeant
  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Under your bed
Posts: 97
Reputation: 17
Points: 555, Level: 1
Points: 555, Level: 1 Points: 555, Level: 1 Points: 555, Level: 1
Level up: 31%, 345 Points needed
Level up: 31% Level up: 31% Level up: 31%
Activity: 1.5%
Activity: 1.5% Activity: 1.5% Activity: 1.5%

The packet headers are indeed scrambled. They're xor'd with a key obtained by the SRP authentication. The key is 20 bytes long (Not sure where you'd find it in the client). Sent packets headers (Client->Server, AKA CMSG in emulators) are 6 bytes long, with a uint16 size, and uint32 opcode. Received messages (Server->Client, aka SMSG) are only 2 bytes, with just the opcode.

Here's a C# sniplet of my class to handle this encryption.

Code:
/// <summary>
	/// This class handles the encryption that is done on the headers of world server packets.
	/// The Key is 20 bytes long
	/// </summary>
	public class WoWCrypt
	{

        public class PacketKeyGenerator
        {
            static readonly byte[] SeedKey = { 0x38, 0xA7, 0x83, 0x15, 0xF8, 0x92, 0x25, 0x30, 0x71, 0x98, 0x67, 0xB1, 0x8C, 0x4, 0xE2, 0xAA };

            public static byte[] GenerateKey(byte[] sessionKey)
            {
                byte[] firstBuffer = new byte[64];
                byte[] secondBuffer = new byte[64];

                memset(firstBuffer, 0x36);
                memset(secondBuffer, 0x5C);

                for (int i = 0; i < SeedKey.Length; i++)
                {
                    firstBuffer[i] = (byte)(SeedKey[i] ^ firstBuffer[i]);
                    secondBuffer[i] = (byte)(SeedKey[i] ^ secondBuffer[i]);
                }

                Sha1Hash sha = new Sha1Hash();

                sha.Update(firstBuffer);
                sha.Update(sessionKey);

                byte[] tempDigest = sha.Final();

                sha = new Sha1Hash();

                sha.Update(secondBuffer);
                sha.Update(tempDigest);

                byte[] finalKey = sha.Final();

                return finalKey;
            }

            private static void memset(byte[] buffer, byte value)
            {
                for (int i = 0; i < buffer.Length; i++)
                {
                    buffer[i] = value;
                }
            }
        }
		private bool mInitialised = false;
		
		// Encryption state
		private byte mEncPrev;
		public int mEncIndex;
		// Decryption state
		public byte mDecPrev; 
		public int mDecIndex;

		public byte[] mKey;

		public void Init(byte[] Key)
		{
            mKey = PacketKeyGenerator.GenerateKey(Key);
			mInitialised = true;
		}
        public byte GetDecPrev()
        {
            return mDecPrev;
        }
        public void SetDecPrev(byte SetTo)
        {
            mDecPrev = SetTo;
        }
        public int GetDecIndex()
        {
            return mDecIndex;
        }
        public void SetDecIndex(int SetTo)
        {
            mDecIndex = SetTo;
        }
		public void Decrypt(byte[] Data, int Length)
		{
			if (mInitialised == false) return;

			for(int i = 0; i < Length; ++i)
			{
				byte x = (byte)((Data[i] - mDecPrev) ^ mKey[mDecIndex]);
				++mDecIndex;
				mDecIndex %= mKey.Length;
				mDecPrev = Data[i];
				Data[i] = x;
			}
		}

		public void Encrypt(byte[] Data, int Length)
		{
			if (mInitialised == false) return;
			
			for(int i = 0; i < Length; ++i)
			{
				byte x = (byte)((Data[i] ^ mKey[mEncIndex]) + mEncPrev);
				++mEncIndex;
				mEncIndex %= mKey.Length;
				mEncPrev = x;
				Data[i] = x;
			}			
		}
	}
and the C++ version

Code:
class WowCrypt {
public:
    WowCrypt(const unsigned int send, const unsigned int recv);
    ~WowCrypt();

    const unsigned int CRYPTED_SEND_LEN;
    const unsigned int CRYPTED_RECV_LEN;

    void Init();

    void SetKey(uint8 *, size_t);
	void GenKey(uint8 *, size_t, uint8 *);

    void DecryptRecv(uint8 *, size_t);
    void EncryptSend(uint8 *, size_t);

    bool IsInitialized() { return _initialized; }

private:
    std::vector<uint8> _key;
    uint8 _send_i, _send_j, _recv_i, _recv_j;
    bool _initialized;
};

#include <algorithm>

WowCrypt::WowCrypt(const unsigned int send, const unsigned int recv) : CRYPTED_SEND_LEN(send), CRYPTED_RECV_LEN(recv)
{
    _initialized = false;
}

void WowCrypt::Init()
{
    _send_i = _send_j = _recv_i = _recv_j = 0;
    _initialized = true;
}

void WowCrypt::DecryptRecv(uint8 *data, size_t len)
{
    if (!_initialized) return;
    if (len < CRYPTED_RECV_LEN) return;

    for (size_t t = 0; t < CRYPTED_RECV_LEN; t++) {
        _recv_i %= _key.size();
        uint8 x = (data[t] - _recv_j) ^ _key[_recv_i];
        ++_recv_i;
        _recv_j = data[t];
        data[t] = x;
    }
}

void WowCrypt::EncryptSend(uint8 *data, size_t len)
{
    if (!_initialized) return;
    if (len < CRYPTED_SEND_LEN) return;

    for (size_t t = 0; t < CRYPTED_SEND_LEN; t++) {
        _send_i %= _key.size();
        uint8 x = (data[t] ^ _key[_send_i]) + _send_j;
        ++_send_i;
        data[t] = _send_j = x;
    }
}

void WowCrypt::SetKey(uint8 *key, size_t len)
{
    _key.resize(len);
    std::copy(key, key + len, _key.begin());
}

WowCrypt::~WowCrypt()
{
}
[edit]

I've been thinking of doing a brute-forcer to brute force the key (fairly simple to do) on pcap's of wow's tcp stream. but that is another method of obtaining the encryption key without touching the client memory (but for you guys, whats the fun in that?). For example, capturing 20 or so ping packets (because they're sequential and easy to identify) would be sufficient data to brute the key. much like how WEP bruter's work.

Last edited by BoogieManTM; 12-15-2008 at 03:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-15-2008
lanman92 is offline.
Site Donator
  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 766
Reputation: 20
Points: 3,871, Level: 6
Points: 3,871, Level: 6 Points: 3,871, Level: 6 Points: 3,871, Level: 6
Level up: 31%, 629 Points needed
Level up: 31% Level up: 31% Level up: 31%
Activity: 6.3%
Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3% Activity: 6.3%

Ok, so I'm awfully confused. I'm detouring at 0x005843A0, is that even the correct address? I have it logging the value of the parameter and address everytime that it gets called, but it only logs once each time I log into WoW and inject... Here's my code.

Code:
 
void __declspec(naked) __stdcall SendPacket(DWORD *pDataStore)
{
        __asm pushad;
        addLog(pDataStore);
        __asm popad;
        __asm jmp orig_SendPacket;
        __asm retn;
}
void __stdcall addLog(DWORD *pDataStore)
{
        fstream fs;
        if(!opened)
        {
                fs.open("C:\\Users\\Nick\\Documents\\wowlog.txt", ios::out | ios::app | ios::in);
                opened = true;
        }
        DWORD data = *pDataStore;
        fs << data << endl;
        fs << pDataStore << endl;
        return;
}

Last edited by lanman92; 12-15-2008 at 05:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-16-2008
Cypher's Avatar
Cypher is offline.
Kynox's sister's pimp
Legendary User
  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: ntdll.dll
Posts: 4,182
Nominated 63 Times in 4 Posts
Nominated TOTM/W Award(s): 1
Reputation: 1085
Points: 55,512, Level: 35
Points: 55,512, Level: 35 Points: 55,512, Level: 35 Points: 55,512, Level: 35
Level up: 14%, 3,188 Points needed
Level up: 14% Level up: 14% Level up: 14%
Activity: 43.9%
Activity: 43.9% Activity: 43.9% Activity: 43.9%

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoogieManTM View Post
The packet headers are indeed scrambled. They're xor'd with a key obtained by the SRP authentication. The key is 20 bytes long (Not sure where you'd find it in the client). Sent packets headers (Client->Server, AKA CMSG in emulators) are 6 bytes long, with a uint16 size, and uint32 opcode. Received messages (Server->Client, aka SMSG) are only 2 bytes, with just the opcode.

Here's a C# sniplet of my class to handle this encryption.

Code:
/// <summary>
	/// This class handles the encryption that is done on the headers of world server packets.
	/// The Key is 20 bytes long
	/// </summary>
	public class WoWCrypt
	{

        public class PacketKeyGenerator
        {
            static readonly byte[] SeedKey = { 0x38, 0xA7, 0x83, 0x15, 0xF8, 0x92, 0x25, 0x30, 0x71, 0x98, 0x67, 0xB1, 0x8C, 0x4, 0xE2, 0xAA };

            public static byte[] GenerateKey(byte[] sessionKey)
            {
                byte[] firstBuffer = new byte[64];
                byte[] secondBuffer = new byte[64];

                memset(firstBuffer, 0x36);
                memset(secondBuffer, 0x5C);

                for (int i = 0; i < SeedKey.Length; i++)
                {
                    firstBuffer[i] = (byte)(SeedKey[i] ^ firstBuffer[i]);
                    secondBuffer[i] = (byte)(SeedKey[i] ^ secondBuffer[i]);
                }

                Sha1Hash sha = new Sha1Hash();

                sha.Update(firstBuffer);
                sha.Update(sessionKey);

                byte[] tempDigest = sha.Final();

                sha = new Sha1Hash();

                sha.Update(secondBuffer);
                sha.Update(tempDigest);

                byte[] finalKey = sha.Final();

                return finalKey;
            }

            private static void memset(byte[] buffer, byte value)
            {
                for (int i = 0; i < buffer.Length; i++)
                {
                    buffer[i] = value;
                }
            }
        }
		private bool mInitialised = false;
		
		// Encryption state
		private byte mEncPrev;
		public int mEncIndex;
		// Decryption state
		public byte mDecPrev; 
		public int mDecIndex;

		public byte[] mKey;

		public void Init(byte[] Key)
		{
            mKey = PacketKeyGenerator.GenerateKey(Key);
			mInitialised = true;
		}
        public byte GetDecPrev()
        {
            return mDecPrev;
        }
        public void SetDecPrev(byte SetTo)
        {
            mDecPrev = SetTo;
        }
        public int GetDecIndex()
        {
            return mDecIndex;
        }
        public void SetDecIndex(int SetTo)
        {
            mDecIndex = SetTo;
        }
		public void Decrypt(byte[] Data, int Length)
		{
			if (mInitialised == false) return;

			for(int i = 0; i < Length; ++i)
			{
				byte x = (byte)((Data[i] - mDecPrev) ^ mKey[mDecIndex]);
				++mDecIndex;
				mDecIndex %= mKey.Length;
				mDecPrev = Data[i];
				Data[i] = x;
			}
		}

		public void Encrypt(byte[] Data, int Length)
		{
			if (mInitialised == false) return;
			
			for(int i = 0; i < Length; ++i)
			{
				byte x = (byte)((Data[i] ^ mKey[mEncIndex]) + mEncPrev);
				++mEncIndex;
				mEncIndex %= mKey.Length;
				mEncPrev = x;
				Data[i] = x;
			}			
		}
	}
and the C++ version

Code:
class WowCrypt {
public:
    WowCrypt(const unsigned int send, const unsigned int recv);
    ~WowCrypt();

    const unsigned int CRYPTED_SEND_LEN;
    const unsigned int CRYPTED_RECV_LEN;

    void Init();

    void SetKey(uint8 *, size_t);
	void GenKey(uint8 *, size_t, uint8 *);

    void DecryptRecv(uint8 *, size_t);
    void EncryptSend(uint8 *, size_t);

    bool IsInitialized() { return _initialized; }

private:
    std::vector<uint8> _key;
    uint8 _send_i, _send_j, _recv_i, _recv_j;
    bool _initialized;
};

#include <algorithm>

WowCrypt::WowCrypt(const unsigned int send, const unsigned int recv) : CRYPTED_SEND_LEN(send), CRYPTED_RECV_LEN(recv)
{
    _initialized = false;
}

void WowCrypt::Init()
{
    _send_i = _send_j = _recv_i = _recv_j = 0;
    _initialized = true;
}

void WowCrypt::DecryptRecv(uint8 *data, size_t len)
{
    if (!_initialized) return;
    if (len < CRYPTED_RECV_LEN) return;

    for (size_t t = 0; t < CRYPTED_RECV_LEN; t++) {
        _recv_i %= _key.size();
        uint8 x = (data[t] - _recv_j) ^ _key[_recv_i];
        ++_recv_i;
        _recv_j = data[t];
        data[t] = x;
    }
}

void WowCrypt::EncryptSend(uint8 *data, size_t len)
{
    if (!_initialized) return;
    if (len < CRYPTED_SEND_LEN) return;

    for (size_t t = 0; t < CRYPTED_SEND_LEN; t++) {
        _send_i %= _key.size();
        uint8 x = (data[t] ^ _key[_send_i]) + _send_j;
        ++_send_i;
        data[t] = _send_j = x;
    }
}

void WowCrypt::SetKey(uint8 *key, size_t len)
{
    _key.resize(len);
    std::copy(key, key + len, _key.begin());
}

WowCrypt::~WowCrypt()
{
}
[edit]

I've been thinking of doing a brute-forcer to brute force the key (fairly simple to do) on pcap's of wow's tcp stream. but that is another method of obtaining the encryption key without touching the client memory (but for you guys, whats the fun in that?). For example, capturing 20 or so ping packets (because they're sequential and easy to identify) would be sufficient data to brute the key. much like how WEP bruter's work.

Omgawd its boogie!!1111oneoneone

Sup?

PS. Isn't the key stored in the CNetClient class or something? I can't recall.
__________________
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] Back online!

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can **** off."
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

"I can write very coherent things when I try that sound very good" -- Styles
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-16-2008
BoogieManTM's Avatar
BoogieManTM is offline.
Master Sergeant
  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Under your bed
Posts: 97
Reputation: 17
Points: 555, Level: 1
Points: 555, Level: 1 Points: 555, Level: 1 Points: 555, Level: 1
Level up: 31%, 345 Points needed
Level up: 31% Level up: 31% Level up: 31%
Activity: 1.5%
Activity: 1.5% Activity: 1.5% Activity: 1.5%

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cypher View Post

Omgawd its boogie!!1111oneoneone

Sup?

PS. Isn't the key stored in the CNetClient class or something? I can't recall.
yo yo, same shit diff day. I see you're having fun with the newbs 'round here, lol! some pretty entertaining reads.


I wouldn't be surprised if it was in CNetClient, it would be a fitting place for it.. but as I do all the key generation myself, I never had to fiddle around with how the client deals with it much. Either way, grabbing it from memory, or just brute forcing the damn thing (a few proxies have implemented this method before), its fairly straight forward get around the header encryption.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-16-2008
kynox's Avatar
kynox is online.
Warden's Mediator
Legendary User
  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Raping your Stack
Posts: 774
Nominated 2 Times in 1 Post
Reputation: 797
Points: 28,091, Level: 24
Points: 28,091, Level: 24 Points: 28,091, Level: 24 Points: 28,091, Level: 24
Level up: 53%, 809 Points needed
Level up: 53% Level up: 53% Level up: 53%
Activity: 5.2%
Activity: 5.2% Activity: 5.2% Activity: 5.2%

Quote:
I wouldn't be surprised if it was in CNetClient, it would be a fitting place for it.. but as I do all the key generation myself, I never had to fiddle around with how the client deals with it much. Either way, grabbing it from memory, or just brute forcing the damn thing (a few proxies have implemented this method before), its fairly straight forward get around the header encryption.
Tis stored in CNetClient indeed. But if this guy can't even detour a function, i hardly see this helping him.

PS: HAI BOOGIE
__________________
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-16-2008
Xeta is offline.
Private
  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4
Reputation: 7
Points: 489, Level: 1
Points: 489, Level: 1 Points: 489, Level: 1 Points: 489, Level: 1
Level up: 18%, 411 Points needed
Level up: 18% Level up: 18% Level up: 18%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Just wanted to add a bit more info

BoogieMan, you can replace the C# PacketGenerator class with 1 line:
byte[] mKey = new System.Security.Cryptography.HMACSHA1(EncryptionSeed).ComputeHash(SessionKey);

The key generation is just HMAC sha1 seeded with those 16 static bytes.

Also, packets can have either 2 or 3 bytes in the header for the size field, depending on how big the packet is. If the packet is over 32767 bytes, 3 bytes are used, and the first byte is OR'd with 0x80 as a marker

if (size > 32767)
{
packetHeader[0] = ((size >> 16) & 0xFF) | 0x80;
packetHeader[1] = (size >> 8) & 0xFF;
packetHeader[2] = size & 0xFF;
}
else
{
packetHeader[0] = (size >> 8) & 0xFF;
packetHeader[1] = size & 0xFF;
}

This goes for both server-sent and client-sent packets

Now for some offsets
At (ClientConnection + 0x27E4) is a pointer to the class that handles the actual communication with the server. I just called this WoWConnection, but it could be the CNetClient

struct WoWConnection
{
int field_0;
SOCKET Socket;
int field_8;
int field_C;
int field_10;
ClientConnection* ClientConnectionPtr;
int field_18;
char *InputBuffer;
int InputBufferPosition;
int InputBufferSize;
int field_28[27];
struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION CS_field_94;
int field_AC;
int ProcessingThreadId;
ClientConnection* SavedClientConnectionContext;
int field_B8[9];
WDSNode PacketQueue;// 0xDC - 0xE8
struct _RTL_CRITICAL_SECTION CS_field_E8;
int field_100[6];
char IsEncryptionInitialized;// 0x118
char EncKeyIndex;
char EncKeyPrevious;
char ClientOpcodeLen; // always 4
char DecKeyIndex;
char DecKeyPrevious;
char ServerOpcodeLen; // always 2
char EncryptionKey[20]; // 0x11F - 0x133 this is whats used to encrypt packets
}

Now if you need the full 40byte sessionkey for some reason, its at ClientConnection+0x288.
The client still keeps this because its used to seed warden modules and hashed in one of the bot packets, but thats another matter

And if you want to see the CDataStore class for the packets, go to [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] and check out datastore.cpp/h. Its looks to be the exact same as what the client uses, based on some of the function names in the asserts of the ptr clients

-Ralek

Still waiting on my new account to activate, been a few days now. Had to grab this old one from way back
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-16-2008
kynox's Avatar
kynox is online.
Warden's Mediator
Legendary User
  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Raping your Stack
Posts: 774
Nominated 2 Times in 1 Post
Reputation: 797
Points: 28,091, Level: 24
Points: 28,091, Level: 24 Points: 28,091, Level: 24 Points: 28,091, Level: 24
Level up: 53%, 809 Points needed
Level up: 53% Level up: 53% Level up: 53%
Activity: 5.2%
Activity: 5.2% Activity: 5.2% Activity: 5.2%

About time we had someone with sense post in these forums. Welcome!
__________________
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493