[wymond]

You will own. Don't doubt me!

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Ticko]

Umm, I can't post links, but imp cleave sux mate. I'll post my build when I can

[Amedis]

That build is .. Not so hot. Personally, I use swords, although admitibly, Maces is better for 2v2. I suggest going with something like this:

[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Poofy]

I think maces are way better than swords because of mace stun. Most good warriors use maces.

[Amedis]

Originally Posted by Poofy

I think maces are way better than swords because of mace stun. Most good warriors use maces.

I take offence to that. Iv been 2200+ and I use swords. As I said, Maces are better for 2v2, though even that is arguable. 2v2 with a Shaman, windfury and sword spec is a deadly spike damage that can catch anyone off gaurd. I prefer swords for 5v5 though. Last season I ran Felguard Warlock, Disc Priest, Warrior, Palladin, Elemental Shaman, and it worked great. It really is a matter of personal prefernce. Skill > Gear.

[Poofy]

Whats your armory? Just wondering your spec and such.

[Sadchaos]

Mace stun I think is more useful. Sure sword proc is good for more damage but I think the stun has more pressure and is more useful. But in 2v2 I'd say. 5v5 it's really open. Hell, I once went polearm because I was bored.

[trancehax]

You can't beat mace stun...
Nuff said

[Surrounder]

I run swords for 5s but prefer mace for 2s. So many times where i've gotten a mace stun on a druid that just switched out of bear to heal @ 20-10% and ended up being the game there.