[Gelormino]

Alright, After a little chatting in the bawx, alot of us think it kind of sucks when people bump OLD threads that have been dead for months on end.

Or more importantly...Just pure bragging threads "I scammed the best char on my server!"

I also belong to another forum called pbnation.com, in which you can actually be BANNED for "Grave-Digging"

For those of you that done know, grave digging is looking around for old threads and reviving them.

Now, im not saying users should be banned for grave-digging, but maybe adding it to the rules and handing out infractions for it would teach people a lesson.

[SectorSeven]

/signed

Couldn't agree more... or could I ... if there was Pokemon involved.

[Kuiren]

There's already a rule and infraction for this.. though the rule is very sketchy.
I would think anything over a month is grave digging..

[Herleybob]

What if that person would need help with that post, if it was a guide. Well i guess he could go and make a new thread where you could ask questions.

/signed

[Aestysu]

but why take a month to read it?
i agree with this also

/sign

[Saiket]

To grave dig or to repost... It's a serious dilemma, and I think I'd choose not to contribute if I could be arbitrarily actioned for either one.

Couldn't the maximum thread reply age simply be shortened? I remember getting an error when I tried to bump an older exploit that had been revived and edited. (Please don't hurt me for attempted grave digging!) At least that way, the law is set in stone.

[Errage]

There already is an infraction for this, and a rule. Just report it, and Mods will deal with it.