[kreckiq]

I really agree with [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

[Czchar]

This is in the wrong section, there is a WHOLE talent spec section..

[gogobananas]

Combat maces is the best for arena situations imo, where stunning is vital. Sub spec is better in battlegrounds.

[Eternalblood]

Correct me if im wrong but this should be in the "Talent Spec" section?

[hugmepls]

wrong section + just stick to the mainstream 20/0/41 and you'll do fine..

[noel3903]

Originally Posted by vince0001

sleight of hand is DEFINITELY not needed, and a lotta other stuff can be changed for better

Really the 40 to 80 extra resl...isnt needed ...well then u must never be the target..in arean...i think it is a must have just take 2 from camouflage....its well worth it being shs u have a lot of speed and mobility in arena even with out the 2 extra in camo!!! imo...

[Ozon]

Its good but can get better

[dmc22]

Originally Posted by gogobananas

Combat maces is the best for arena situations imo, where stunning is vital. Sub spec is better in battlegrounds.

i find that stunning gets annoying when facing ms warrs... other than taht its a very valuable arena aspect..

[hugmepls]

Since AR/Prep was nerfed, Mace specc isn't viable any more for rogues.

I played above 2400+ all the seasons and Ive never seen any combat specced rogues above 2k..

ShS generally, if you play disc/rogue you should consider going for mutilate but gernerally ShS is THE spec atm.

[Bloodzs]

Imp gouge isn't needed unless you find yourself 1v1ing every fight.
It's definitely more aimed towards 1v1 fighting as it's a really short range CC.

[criteria55]

Originally Posted by kreckiq

I really agree with [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

id rather max out camo and lethality, idk but i always seem to ge tlightning reflexes too just my opinion