Technically Ascent is dead, allthough there are some people working on/with it underground
Now there is AspireDev
(checking questions)
- Good things about ArcEmu and Ascent?
Arcemu, AspireDev, OpenAscent all are derived from Ascent/Antrix
Good things: Stability, Capacity(players), easy to use
- Wich Emu is best? ArcEmu or AspireDev?
Since both are derived from Ascent, there is no big difference... allthough now i think AspireDev is ahead of Arcemu...
- Which Emu do you Recommend for Users/Beginners?
Well both are exacly the same (as far as running and source is 75% the same)... so any of them is OK

If you talk about Mangos, Arcemu, AspireDev and Kobold i would advice AspireDev or Arcemu...
- Why do you Recommend that Emu?
It is very easy to use and there are way more repacks/funstuff for it also to support beginners...
There is a good dev team behind it and both of them have daily updates.
- What is the bad thing about ArcEmu and/or Ascent?
Arcemu: copypaste emu like a lot of developers call it... the core is a little less stable then AspireDev and AspireDev kept its structure nicer.
Nothing of your concern if you are a beginner and not thinking about core-editing.
- What do you think is the bad thing about ArcEmu and/or Ascent?
Arcemu has a lot of 14 year olds in the community that talk crap (14 year olds = figuraly)
AspireDev also has some of these kids (who hasn't? even mmowned has)
- Which Emu is the Easiest to Setup? ArcEmu or Ascent?
Both are almost exacly 100% the same... there are just small differences in the config files (extra options etc) So both of them are the same level of difficulty to setup
- Why is that one the Easiest to Setup?
/
- Which Emu is the most Stable? ArcEmu or Ascent?
AspireDev a little more stable maybe, but you can't tell the difference...
- Why is that one Stable?
Less copy-paste and more structure
- Which Emu has less Bugs in Northrend etc? ArcEmu or Ascent?
Hard tosay, both have nice things working... AspireDev worked on new systems for the emulator (scripting etc), Arcemu has done its share...
They both have a lot of things worked on, can't really tell wich one of them has 'most'
- What is the Bugs on ArcEmu or Ascent?
If you want me to write down all the bugs then you better prepare for a post of 1000 pages

Every emulator has thousands and thousands of bugs... A lot of them are small bugs, but there are big ones too
- Do you think that they'll be fixable in the Future?
Every bug is fixable... the thing is if you fix one bug (editing a part of code) you could be making 10 new bugs... that is the hard thing about programming with sources like these... everything is combined so if you touch one thing, you touch 20 things

But yes i do think both of these emulators have a very nice future and will solve a lot of the bigger bugs
- For how long have you been using ArcEmu or Ascent?
Used Antrix then Ascent all the way... used Arcemu after that for a while and now using AspireDev 24/7
- Why do you use the Emu?
Becuz my friend/developer Aceindy is working on that project and becuz i see more potential in it
- How many Stars to you give the Emu-Team?
AspireDev: 8
Arcemu: 6
if 10 was max
- Why so many Stars?
Explained most of it already
- What is the exact Difference between ArcEmu and Ascent?
The difference is that both projects went their own way.... so they both have new features, other teams, other fixes, ....
But they look a lot like eachother becuz they derive from the same emulator.
- Why are they Different?
Becuz the 2 teams went their own way... they both started making new features, developing new stuff etc... in their own way
- Why are some of the Unstable and some of the are Stable?
If you see unstable serves then most likely it is a funserver or repack server... those are the most unstable ones.
Some revisions could be more stable then others too... simply becuz of the source that is edited... if devs made a small mistake it could cause instability for example (way more examples then that though)